Examination for Professional Practice of Psychology (EPPP) Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Examination for Professional Practice of Psychology (EPPP) with tailored quizzes and comprehensive resources to ensure your success in this crucial test. Build your confidence and knowledge with insights and well-crafted questions that reflect the exam format.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is one characteristic of structured interviews in relation to unstructured interviews for predicting performance?

  1. Their predictive validity is equal when used alone

  2. They are less valid without structured items

  3. Their predictability is consistently better when combined with cognitive ability measures

  4. They are most valid predictors when separately administered

The correct answer is: Their predictability is consistently better when combined with cognitive ability measures

Structured interviews are designed with specific questions and a consistent format, which enhances their reliability and predictive validity regarding job performance. This consistency allows for a more objective assessment of candidates, as each individual is evaluated on the same criteria, making it easier to compare their responses. When combined with cognitive ability measures, structured interviews tend to show even greater predictive validity due to the complementarity of skills being assessed. Cognitive ability measures capture general intellectual capabilities, which are often key indicators of job performance; when these are paired with the systematic evaluation provided by structured interviews, the overall prediction of a candidate's performance improves. This synergy allows employers to form a more comprehensive view of a candidate’s qualifications and potential fit for the role. Other options do not accurately represent the relationship between structured and unstructured interviews. For instance, structured interviews do not have equal predictive validity when used alone as unstructured interviews often exhibit greater variability and can be influenced by interviewer biases. Additionally, while structured interviews are more effective, they do not necessarily become less valid without structured items; instead, their structured nature enhances validity. The claim that they are most valid predictors when administered separately does not align with evidence suggesting that a combination of assessment methods typically yields stronger predictions.